Get off the fence and support immigration reform
Some Catholics aren't so sure about the bishops' push for comprehensive immigration reform, but this Catholic activist says it's time for the entire church to stick up for immigrants.
Ask any priest or nun working with Latino immigrants in the United States, and they will tell you that many of their parishioners are living in a state of terror. Then ask them what the larger Catholic community is doing about it, and the answer will likely be: "Damn little!"
Immigration reform died an ugly death in 2007. The professional pushers of addictive resentment and fear-such as Michael Savage and Lou Dobbs-created a toxic anti-immigrant smog that spread over our nation. Bullies rule the land, and decent people are silent.
The result is a shameful regimen of racial profiling, paramilitary abuse of force by out-of-control Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and the denial of due process to the unlucky immigrants caught up in the backlash against undocumented migrants.
Most important to Catholics is the destruction of families through deportations. In 2008 ICE deported 267,000 undocumented immigrants. The overwhelming majority were simply workers building a life with their families in this land. Our nation has not seen as shameful a spasm of immigrant abuse since "Operation Wetback" deported a million Mexican laborers abruptly deemed redundant after World War II.
While President Obama has thankfully initiated a moratorium on workplace raids, even under his administration the misery continues. The ICE website brags that deportations are up 18 percent nationally over 2008 levels. This despite Obama's oft-stated position that current immigration laws are broken and that a practical, comprehensive reform package is necessary.
Immigration reform is only fair to the thousands of immigrant families who have been whipsawed by our historically capricious treatment of undocumented workers. For decades the United States turned a blind eye to the illegal immigration of Mexican workers across our southern border. Their cheap labor was convenient to powerful farmers, to poultry and meatpacking industries, to restaurant owners, and to all of us who enjoy cheap vegetables.
Now a souring economy means that the "illegal" workers are surplus laborers, and national security demands that we know who is living in our nation.
But rhetorical or real clampdowns on undocumented workers are all show. The owners of the meatpacking companies, farmers, restaurants, manufacturers, or other small businesses that rely on this workforce are rarely prosecuted. And even at a greatly accelerated pace of deportations, it would take some 48 years to deport the estimated 12 million undocumented workers currently in the United States-assuming no one else ever crosses the border.
How well has the U.S. church responded to this cultural and actual assault against undocumented workers? The honest answer would have to be "mixed."
The official position of church leadership has been superb. The U.S. and Mexican bishops jointly issued the pastoral letter Strangers No Longer seven years ago, calling for family unification and a broad legalization program.
As early as 2003 the bishops saw the increasingly ugly tone of the debate: "Alarmingly, migrants often are treated as criminals. Misperceptions and xenophobic and racist attitudes in both the United States and Mexico contribute to an atmosphere in which undocumented persons are discriminated against and abused."
Grounded in scripture and Catholic social teaching, the pastoral declares that "the human dignity and human rights of undocumented immigrants should be respected."
Since then, the church also has launched the Catholic Campaign for Immigration Reform (justiceforimmigrants.org) to mobilize its institutions and people in the struggle for justice for undocumented migrants.
Joshua Hoyt is the executive director of the Illinois Coalition of Immigrant and Refugee Rights.This article appeared in the February 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75. No. 2, pp. 29-33).
Comments (8)
When you talk about us
By Ricardo Diaz (not verified) on Tuesday, March 2, 2010It's always amazing to me that when people make arguments against charity towards immigrants, they forget that we are also in the room; sometimes, we even speak English.
While I understand the fear of being overwhelmed and even replaced, the argument right now is about laws that break our religious traditions and convictions.
As far as I remember, Christ did not try to cause social change by looking at the politics of things; to Caesar was given the tax but He acted individually in charity and benevolence.
Other countries, including the sender countries are usually to blame for the situation within their territory but most of us chose to leave, to start over, to look towards a brighter future; we no longer believed that the future for our families could be better within those boundaries. For many that came willingly, we left behind a country but not a religion.
If the local US membership does not want us for the Catholics that we are then we will still seek to progress beyond them; we did not come to make things worse for you or for ourselves.
Colonize Mexico -- A Win-Win
By Anonymous (not verified) on Friday, February 19, 2010One solution that wouldn't mean Catholics encouraging law-breaking, as this article does, would be to colonize Mexico.
Colonizing Mexico, or parts of Mexico, is in the true (non-revisionist history) tradition of American evangelism.
If we colonize parts of Mexico, the Mexicans living in those parts no longer seek to illegally/unlawfully/wrongly cross the border, the integrity of the immigration process is preserved, and the United States gets a return on its investment in the would-be criminals.
For the amounts of criminal Mexicans living in the United States, I could even see a moral justification for taking the land by force for no consideration, in return for the law-breaking we allow Mexicans to do here.
I think it's a win-win.
I started to write a lengthy
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, February 17, 2010I started to write a lengthy response but I'm not going to lend legitimacy to this anti-God, socialist propaganda by posting it. I'm kind of new to USCatholic.org; is it a pseudo-Catholic whacky liberal think tank?
Immigration
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, February 10, 2010As someone who has followed this argument for a number of decades and who disagrees with a blanket amnesty program which unfortunately the USCCB seems to promote; some rational arguments need to replace the emotional shouting which advocates of "social justice" aim at so called "racist anti-immigration" opponents. As an international relations student in the 70s I learned of the cost of the brain drain, when higher educated students and professionals had free immigration to western countries where there was little incentive for them to go back and develop their home countries. Today this still occurs, but also includes a less educated group who desire and expect immediate acceptance and privileges that legally they are not entitled to. The desire to help individual immigrants conflicts with the goal of helping entire countries unless we only include remittances and alien citizenship rights to permanently anchor their families with far greater potential and services than offered at countries of birth. The greater social justice may be better served by requiring reverse migration thereby allowing these hard working and brave individuals to rebuild their home countries with greater social justice for all.
Immigration
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, February 10, 2010As someone who has followed this argument for a number of decades and who disagrees with a blanket amnesty program which unfortunately the USCCB seems to promote; some rational arguments need to replace the emotional shouting which advocates of "social justice" aim at so called "racist anti-immigration" opponents. As an international relations student in the 70s I learned of the cost of the brain drain, when higher educated students and professionals had free immigration to western countries where there was little incentive for them to go back and develop their home countries. Today this still occurs, but also includes a less educated group who desire and expect immediate acceptance and privileges that legally they are not entitled to. The desire to help individual immigrants conflicts with the goal of helping entire countries unless we only include remittances and alien citizenship rights to permanently anchor their families with far greater potential and services than offered at countries of birth. The greater social justice may be better served by requiring reverse migration thereby allowing these hard working and brave individuals to rebuild their home countries with greater social justice for all.
Immigration
By Brother Alan Parham, FSC (not verified) on Tuesday, February 9, 2010People seem so afraid of those who do not speak "our language." Yet, English is not the official language of the United States. So many Catholics lament the number of Latinos who join non-Catholic sects, yet they comoplain about the Latinos in our midst in the local parishes. Ironically, some of these same parishes would have no future without the Latino influx. The Catholic Church in the US has always reached out to immigrants and that is not going to change because we are Roman Catholics, not American Catholics.
Immigration Reform in Vatican City
By Steve in AZ (not verified) on Wednesday, January 20, 2010The Vatican needs to embrace comprehensive immigration reform to allow Saudis, Turks, Egyptians, Algerians and Sudanese to travel to and stay, permenently, in Vatican City. That way, the Vatican will become an Islamic State in no time. Oh, wait! Do we really want that?
Maybe we Americans aren't ready to live in a country more like Mexico, than America. Maybe, just maybe, before the Catholic Church scolds America and demands that we throw our borders wide open and embrace any-old-whoever wants to skamper into our country, the Catholic Church should put its money where its mouth is and do what it demands of us. Let's watch the results!
Well said!
By Anonymous (not verified) on Monday, February 1, 2010I am right there with you Steve. I think the Catholic Church is playing "armchair administration"--a fun game where bishops with no real-world responsibility of running a country get to scold everyone who doesn't agree with their ridiculous social policies.
